From the archive · A retrospective
Mossad killed the wrong man in Lillehammer. The arrests exposed a European trail.
Norway’s inquiry traced the murder, the criminal convictions and the diplomatic limits of the investigation.
Ahmed Bouchikhi was walking home from a film with his wife when gunmen killed him in Lillehammer on July 21, 1973. The Moroccan waiter had become the victim of an Israeli intelligence operation. Norway’s later official inquiry concluded that the killing arose from mistaken identity.
The presumed target was Ali Hassan Salameh, whom the inquiry described as a leading figure linked to the Munich attack of the previous year. Bouchikhi lived and worked in Norway. His wife witnessed the shooting, and the operation brought a foreign assassination campaign directly into a Norwegian criminal investigation.
Police received the murder report at 10:50 that evening. Neighbouring districts were alerted to establish roadblocks, and investigators from Norway’s national criminal police arrived the same night. Six people were eventually tried. On February 1, 1974, five were convicted of differing degrees of complicity; one was acquitted.
The investigation reached beyond the killing itself. Keys and telephone numbers connected suspects to apartments and contacts elsewhere in Europe, including Paris and The Hague. Police exchanged information across borders, and Norwegian investigators travelled abroad to pursue those connections. A failed operation had left an intelligence network vulnerable to ordinary criminal evidence.
Diplomacy complicated the pursuit. The 2000 inquiry found that some overseas lines of investigation had not been fully followed and described pressure from Israel against pursuing the foreign branches. It also rejected allegations that Norwegian authorities or citizens had participated in the murder before, during or after the operation.
In a January 1996 parliamentary answer, Justice Minister Grete Faremo said Norway’s courts had been clear about the connection to Israeli intelligence. She cited the Supreme Court’s insistence that such activity could not be accepted on Norwegian territory. Israel’s stated policy, conveyed in a letter from Yitzhak Rabin the previous year, was to withhold comment on reports involving Mossad. The criminal convictions and the continuing dispute over state responsibility followed different tracks.
This retrospective follows Norwegian court and inquiry findings. It preserves Israel’s recorded noncomment position and the inquiry’s rejection of alleged Norwegian participation. No newly discovered evidence is claimed.
Sources & further reading
SPY REGISTER MEMBERSHIP
Stay on the case.
Follow this story through the case files, read The Brief and keep your own saved reports.
$6.67 a month equivalent · $80 billed annually. Or $8 monthly.
Get the member edition →Renews automatically. Cancel renewal online.


